Wednesday 5 September 2007

Surprise win for Klaxons



Congratulations are in order to London based Klaxons for winning last nights prestigous Nationwide Mercury Music Prize. Definite outsiders most people’s money was on Winehouse (who just for the record did turn up and sang “Love is a Losing Game”) or Bat for Lashes. I was gunning for Maps but have to say I am pleasantly surprised with news of the Klaxon’s victory. Singer and bass player Jamie Reynolds made perfect sense when reflecting on the judges decision,

"I think [the Mercury judges] have rewarded forward thinking music," Asked about winning over Winehouse, the band grumbled about having to answer questions about her all day. "She is fantastic, but her record is a retro record, and we have made the most forward thinking record since I don't know how long," Reynolds said.

If its true the award is to honour forward thinking music then Klaxons had it in the bag all along…its just the criteria for winners seems to change every year. Previous winners Arctic Monkeys and Franz Ferdinand could hardly be described as forward thinking but their winning credentials could not be doubted.

Year after year the awards are marred with controversy - I think the board at Mercury need to clean up once and for all what the awards are supposed to reward…that way the awards might make a little bit more sense.

What do you think?

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I agree but don't you think its because they like the media attention it generates?

I would have liked to have seen Amy win. No doubt she was the most talented artist on that list but again what is the criteria for winning?

leon

souler said...

i think its good the kalaxons won. If the award is about forward-thinking music, then klaxons are up there eventing the term new rave.

Google